- Their education — institution, faculty, and program. We assign a tier to each parameter, based on the public information, prestige, and what it takes to graduate.
- Work history — we maintain a detailed work history for experts: where they started, where they work now, how long they’ve been working, how many patients they saw, what kind of patients, and what’s the distribution for conditions. Workplaces are also assigned tiers.
- Scientific contribution — we check if they’ve published any articles, if those articles were published in peer-reviewed journals and which exact journals, along with a tier of a publication. We track their citation number and H-index. We cross-reference it with their peers and associated institutions and labs to confirm that it wasn’t a one-shot but a steady workstream for them.
- References — we check what their colleagues and/or patients say about them.
- Licenses/training — monitoring their NPI and state-level licenses gives us a strong indication if an expert meets the high standards.
- Languages they speak — we check their public information and country of education/work to ensure they speak the language that’s needed for a given project.
- Other work — in certain cases, we monitor if an expert participated in any kind of trials (relevant for oncology/therapeutic domains), or if they obtained funding through the NHS or other governmental programs.
